Revenue visibility
Do you maintain one account-level renewal view combining revenue gap, product usage, service signals, financial signals and account ownership?
OPERATING REVIEW
These are the questions I ask of any post-sales operation, including my own. They are prompts for a clear discussion about ownership, evidence and execution. They are not a score, maturity rating or external benchmark.
Do you maintain one account-level renewal view combining revenue gap, product usage, service signals, financial signals and account ownership?
Does every high-risk account trigger a named, time-bound save play, with actions and outcomes reviewed against GRR?
Are expansion-ready accounts identified using explicit usage, adoption, commercial and customer signals, rather than general CSM judgement alone?
Do operational expansion plays and commercial offers feed one accountable pipeline, with conversion and NRR outcomes tracked?
Can you see cost-to-serve by customer segment, product or service complexity, and delivery channel, rather than only at a function or team level?
Do coverage, entitlements, routing, self-service and global delivery choices reflect customer complexity while protecting quality and CSAT?
Are renewal and expansion decision rights, account ownership and hand-offs clear across Success, Sales, Support, Professional Services and Finance?
Does one source of truth connect customer health, pipeline, capacity, cost, action owners and an agreed operating review cadence?
Are AI use cases prioritised by measurable work, cost or customer value removed, with a business owner and baseline, rather than by pilot count?
Are human override, escalation, quality review, security and data controls defined for AI in customer-facing workflows?